Clarifying user needs I’m thinking about proposing options for the user regarding summaries of French reports: should I summarize claims, legal basis, and timelines? If they want that, I can fetch sources and give a bullet-point summary. Alternatively, they might just want a translation of a text that’s in Chinese, but they didn't specify. Maybe I should respond by asking if they want a summary, analysis, or translation? Since the network is enabled, I could also search for sources if necessary, but I need their confirmation first.Asking for user preferences I’m considering how to ask the user about their preferences regarding the information they want. Should I offer options like a quick overview with key figures, a timeline, an analysis of legal points, or ongoing updates? If they choose the first option, I can fetch the latest details. I need to remember that I shouldn’t run commands unless it’s really necessary, so I’ll keep things concise and straightforward. I can also provide context about typical disputes like wage bonuses, exit clauses, etc. Lastly, I’ll ask which option they prefer!
这是最新进展吗?我这边的知识截至 2024-10,无法直接确认这条“姆巴佩索赔2.4亿欧、巴黎反诉1.4亿”的细节与来源。
要不要我现在帮你查阅法媒原文并做一份可靠汇总?我会给你:
也可以先给快速背景解读(不依赖最新报道),比如这类纠纷里常见的争议项:延期薪水、忠诚奖金/续约奖金、形象权分成、出场或绩效条款、滞纳金与法定利息,以及可能涉及的机构(法国劳资法庭、LFP、FIFA DRC等)。
选项:
地址:河北省承德市双桥区头道牌楼街道
电话:0871-7018717
邮箱:admin@sorrer-haixing.com